Iceland’s bank accounts are frozen? Really?

We all know that the U.S. is having some money troubles. We’ve gotten used to hearing ‘seven hundred billion dollars’ repeated and echoed on TV and the radio and in print. But we are not alone in economic distress. Europe’s been feeling a little panicked, too.

By my reckoning, the first country that did a bail-out plan was Ireland. They jumped right on it:

(from 10/1/08)

Ireland said Tuesday it would guarantee payments on as much as €400 billion ($563 billion) in bank debt…The figure, which the government said guaranteed nearly its entire banking system, is twice the country’s gross domestic product.

Ireland acted a lot faster than the US in doing a bailout. And in terms of the size of the each respective country, Ireland’s move is substantially larger than America’s 700 Billions. Ireland is not nearly as large as the US. I think that speaks well of Ireland’s concern for its people and for its reputation. People will not say that the Irish renege on promises. Although, I would feel concern if I were an Irish taxpayer. But Ireland will probably come out all right.

That’s not true of every country. Take Iceland. Right now, the big explosion of Iceland’s banking has left nothing but rubble. Last year, the excitement was high and the money was pouring in. At that time, the London Times describes the scene in Reykjavik, the capital of Iceland. The “billionaires boys club” rode the wave of a deregulated banking system. The icelandic Krona was quite expensive, and everyone was living large:

Flush with cash raised domestically and from international markets and headed by fresh-faced entrepreneurial chief executives, firms such as Bakkavor Group, FL Group and Baugur have used Reykjavik as an unlikely base for aggressive overseas expansion…

The success of these firms has attracted overseas investment far out of kilter with Iceland’s own small economy… It is one reason for the run on the currency sparked by a mini-financial crisis in Iceland last year. Standard & Poor’s, the credit rating agency, gave warning last week that it may cut the country’s sovereign rating, causing alarm bells to ring …To tame inflation it has lifted interest rates to a record 13.75 per cent.

Interest rates of 13.75%? Hot damn! Sign me up! But wait a minute. Even this optimistic times say there was a mini-crisis in 2006 and some “alarm bells” were ringing because the bank’s reach is out of kilter with the country. But people believed that banks are solid. They never fail; they always keep their promises.

Well, this october surprise was a trick, not a treat for the many investors in Icelandic banks: bupkis. Investors put their money in Iceland, and they aren’t getting it back. Not if you’re not an icelander, anyway. This is doesn’t make happy customers. A bunch of officials are converging on the little island. The British Prime Minister Gordon Brown made some speeches back home, telling his countrymen “We will take further action against the Icelandic authorities wherever that is necessary to recover the money…This is the responsibility of the Icelandic government. They’ve got to take responsibility.”

From what I have found, the Prime Minister has to say something.The situation in Iceland seems to have affected every corner of the UK:

Hundreds of thousand of British consumers have accounts now frozen in Icelandic banks that have collapsed and been nationalized. Also stuck is close to £1 billion held by British regional governments, police and fire departments and London’s transport authority. British companies are also thought to have substantial deposits in Iceland.

As far as the Brits were concerned, this must have seemed a sure thing. Everyone was doing it, and the interest rates were not something to pass by. And even if they had some doubts, Iceland was part of the EU. Every bank that was part of the EU guarantees deposits, just like the FDIC in the US. They could deposit up to 20,000 euros worth of money and be secure. That’s the law:

The government, however, has said it may not be able to compensate foreigners…Iceland Prime Minister Geir Haarde said Friday the two countries are trying to work constructively to resolve the dispute, but he found some of Mr. Brown’s comments in recent days “disconcerting and not very helpful.”

I’d say that the British Prime Minister’s comments were disconcerting! What did he mean by “further action” anyway? Is he planning an invasion? The British navy is good, but how are you going to draw blood from a turnip?

See, the Iceland banks did their job on advertising.The British invested heavily in Iceland, lured by the huge interest rates. They weren’t the only ones either; thirteen and three quarter interest attracted customers from a lot of other European nations. Holland had a lot of money over there too.  But you know what bank-savvy country didn’t fall for this fabulous interest rate deal?

Switzerland.

The land of banking had a populace that apparently knew better than to fall for a “too good to be true” deal. I would like to think that I would be a credulous of such an outlying front-runner on the interest rate game. But maybe if I’d seen the ad, I’d have fallen for it too. Especially if I kept the balance below the 20,000 euro insured limit. If I had, I’d be screwed just like England.

This economic crisis is a challenge to the European Union’s newly achieved economic status. This month euro is falling against the dollar at last. And  the beaurocrats from Belgium haven’t had to deal with this sort of thing before. It will be a history-making and policy-changing adventure.

For Iceland, it will probably be even more of a change. All those Icelandic suits are going to be in mothballs in their closets. They’ll have to return to being fishermen. Or maybe they can go back to their roots and go pillaging like Vikings.But maybe they just did.

fish in a small pond

Thinking of the national scene, and the international scene has got me down. Maybe I should be thinking of my more local scene.

I do live in a pretty nice city, in a pretty nice area. Maybe I should narrow my focus and concentrate on my insular town.

I got myspace spammed with a local website: www.ontheedgeoflaco.com

It’s a homey website, talking about where the garage sales are and what kind of community events are upcoming.

Also, last night, I managed to paint one wall of my living room and wash my dog. That wore me out, so I couldn’t finish transcribing the recipe for peach cobbler I had created out of two other recipes.

We had a birthday potluck at work yesterday–our first–and the cobbler was a hit. Therefore, the recipe was worth retaining.

Also, the crib arrived on Tuesday and is in it’s box waiting to be assembled.

So manymany things happening. Relevant, important things. The dog truly needed a bath and a peach cobbler is a thing of beauty.

And yet these things are very mundane. Contemplating the voter fraud activities of ACORN is a little more exciting, but less wholesome.

Perhaps I should have a sub-blog as part of this website, “Little House in The Foothills”

Our house is little. And perhaps it would be worthwhile to celebrate the nano-events of my life as a point of perspective.

Or maybe…or maybe…I should just read more books.

Election Irrational Rage

I’m feeling a certain regret for becoming an informed citizen.

Talking with a staunch democrat friend, I told her that I thought  Obama would probably win and that maybe it was a good thing: “Maybe people wouldn’t be so mad.”

See, I feel like the anger is coming from the right,” she said.

She was talking about this:

The Secret Service is following up on media reports today that someone in the crowd at a McCain/Palin event suggested killing Barack Obama, according to Secret Service spokesman Malcolm Wiley. The shout of “kill him” followed a Sarah Palin rant on Obama’s relationship with radical Chicagoan Bill Ayers.

Assuming that is an accurate report, shouting murderous intentions is pretty angry. No doubt a rally for McCain is a republican site. So, there is some right anger going on. 

But I’ve been hearing so much rage against Bush for so long, personally. I’ve had liberal friends describe violent and humiliating things they would like to do the the current president. Do I think they would actually do  such things? no. But I am amazed to find these usually rational people be so full of destructive ‘bad energy.’

And now we are at the election. Almost there. I see this old anger directed at McCain, and my homegirl Palin.

What is up with this? I hate to continue to spread these nasty things, but here is some ofwhat I’m talking about:

In a sign of increasing nastiness on the left, supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama have been booing rivals John McCain and Sarah Palin, and even screaming “liar!” — with no response from Obama.

Okay, screaming “liar!” about the opponent is not so bad. But there is more. Michelle Malkin chronicles what she’s found. That post is a comparison of left rage vs. right rage. She, like me, is a conservative. She has collected a bunch of nasty things about Palin and McCain, and reaches back to show the Bush-rage that I’ve been noticing too.

I wanted to find a quote to paste in here, but I just can’t…it’s so distasteful. Read it if you are feeling very balanced, but if you don’t want a downer skip it.

I find this rage incomprehensible. Passion about an issue, I understand. But how do these people, who claim to be so interested in “serving the common good” (a phrase I see repeated and repeated in democrat literature in my community) justify this kind of nastiness?

A lefty femme does admit (an act of honesty) that she enraged by Palin:

What I’ve written on this site about Palin so far has been pretty restrained, considering what I feel for her privately could be described as violent, nay, murderous, rage. When Palin spoke on Wednesday night, my head almost exploded from the incandescent anger boiling in my skull. And I’m not the only one! I had simultaneous IM conversations with many friends, who said things like, “she seems like a fucking monster” and “this feminist wants to murk that idiotic c*nt.”

The tone of the comments on our Palin acceptance speech live blog was pretty similar; in fact, this comment says it all: “I want to punch her in the face and ruin her sh*t. **** her for ruining this historic moment. THANKS SARAH, THE HOTTEST VP.”

[I have censored the language, sorry it’s not a direct quote. Go to the link for the full text]

I see anger from the left, and my friend sees it from the right. It’s not really possible to say which is stonger.

What IS possible to say is, to quote my childcare training, “It’s not OKAY.”

It’s time for a little refresher course:

Expressing your angry feelings in an assertive—not aggressive—manner is the healthiest way to express anger. To do this, you have to learn how to make clear what your needs are, and how to get them met, without hurting others. Being assertive doesn’t mean being pushy or demanding; it means being respectful of yourself and others.

Anger can be suppressed, and then converted or redirected. This happens when you hold in your anger, stop thinking about it, and focus on something positive. The aim is to inhibit or suppress your anger and convert it into more constructive behavior. The danger in this type of response is that if it isn’t allowed outward expression, your anger can turn inward—on yourself. Anger turned inward may cause hypertension, high blood pressure, or depression.

Let’s get real people. Who are we helping with this kind of rage?  Step back, take a breath, and remember it will all be over in less than a month.

Just when I get excited…

So, basically, just this year I got all excited about the election.

And it looks like my team is losing. I could give the links that support that assessment, but I am too depressed.

I guess my newly acquired status as informed citizen has to find a new outlet.

Perhaps I can stay up on women’s issues. I have been reading what IWF.org has to say, and it’s an interesting perspective.

Or maybe I can try to wade through the mess of info about what the heck is happening with the ecoomy. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it, but it’s murky.

I’m sort of too bummed to work it out.

I guess when you get high, there is a come-down. I’ve still got my McCain/Palin lawn sign out, but it’s mostly a token now.

UPDATE: Chris suggests I watch some Fred and Ginger. “That was what they did in the Great Depression! It should be good enough for you.”

 

Female empowerment cuts both ways

I’ve been wanting to post, but every time i start, I just get overwhelmed. There has been a lot of things happening in terms of current events. I feel like I have a lot of catching up to do to figure it out.

That’s especially true because EVERYONE doesn’t know what’s going on–at least with the ecomony.

I turned on the radio to listen to Fresh Air, which I hadn’t been listening to in a while. I thought it would be soothing to hear about something cultural. But I fogot how very very very political Terry Gross is.

She was interviewing a woman who wrote a book about the incomprehensible idea of women organizing as conservatives. Here is part of what she had to say:

Although feminists have long dominated the political landscape in terms of numbers and visibility, they are increasingly being challenged by other national organizations—those that are antifeminist and also claim to represent women’s interests. These conservative women’s groups present a substantial threat to the feminist movement. They are well organized, politically active, and have access to government institutions, political parties, and national media. As these organizations vie with feminists over what women need and desire, they publicly contest definitions of women’s interests and influence political debates and policy outcomes.

The group she is complaining about is the Independent Women’s Forum. And she seems very concerned about their activity in politics and access to speaking to the media. What is this? Would she have it that only her ‘pure feminism’ are allowed to speak?

I was appalled to hear the tone that Terry and her guest took. They were talking about Sarah Palin as a person who was “co-opting” feminist ideals.

How is behaving according to feminist ideals co-opting? Must she agree with every “feminist” ideology to be an empowered woman?

Politics is all about taking the parts that make sense and which work for you and implementing them.

I’m not happy that my promoting my femininity seems to have a long trail of amendments, like a bloated bill in Congress.

I am a Feminist. And I am a conservative.

Listen, Terry. You can’t tell me that since I, as a women, do not meet your preconcieved expectations I must be silent. Female empowerment works both ways.

At least I can thank this broadcast for letting me know about IWF. I’ll be checking it out.

McCain could learn from McKinley

There is a precedent of president’s whose last name begins with ‘Mc’: McKinley was elected in 1897

McKinley is best known to me for having a mountain misnamed after him. That big ol’ alaskan mountain, you know.

And McCain has an alaskan running mate, you know.

But McKinley is also known for being killed in office. He died early. And his VP Teddy Roosevelt, was touted as being inexperienced. But McCain has said in speeches that he admired Teddy Roosevelt.

I’d just like to say, McCain. Take your vitamins and keep your eye out. We wouldn’t want anything to happen to the POTUS.

Obama must overcome the vowel ending barrier

So, Barack Obama has a unique name in the ranks of presidents. He has said “I don’t look like other presidents”

But I the fact is, there has not been a president in living memory whose name ends in a vowel.

Perhaps americans like the security of names which end in the finality of a consonant. It’s reassuring.

Excepting the ‘sometimes y’ from vowel status, the last president with a vowel at the end of their last name was Coolidge.

But let’s be honest, that is a SILENT vowel. There is only one president whose name truly in a vowel sound:

Monroe: elected in 1817, he is the lone vowel ending president.

I’m not sure Obama will be able to face the challenge.

Ben Folds and the suburbia experience

My sweetheart husband burned a mix CD for me. It is things like this that let me know the honeymoon isn’t over yet.

Before he determined do to this thing, we were listening in his office to some CDs. He had Ben Folds on. I said “You know, I love him, but I he is best known for “Brick” which I can’t stand. It’s a song that could make you kill yourself!”

So, the husband decided to make me a mix of cool Ben Folds songs that were not Brick, and he finished it in time for my day of driving. He’s so Cool.

Ben and Chris, that is.

Ben Folds is a white guy with enough jade in his eye to be clever. I was driving the company van down the road that I take every day back and forth to get to work. The first song on the CD:

Rocking the Suburbs

I was bopping along listening to him, and thinking I should play the piano more and do more songwriting myself. And I thought, man, I am so not this guy. I’m from WASILLA, for pete’s sake.

However, I am a lot like the suburb zombie now. I take this same stretch of freeway again and again and again. I have often thought that there is a special me-shaped groove in the road.

I looked at the highway. It did not have any grooves in it. It is a synthetic and flat slab of granite. The anti-yosemite, really.

Maybe it’s me that has the road-shaped groove. I am softer material than this societal infrastructure.

And the two hemispheres of my brain held two thoughts:

‘that’s a cool poetic thought’

and

‘how cringingly depressing.”

And maybe those two thoughts are the best way to describe the experience of listening to Ben Folds.

My favorite song so far:

All U can Eat

Can the main stream media go lower?

I’ve been watching so many news channels and listening to so many different radio stations, I can’t say which one said it. But I heard it more than once:

the house needs to pass this bill; they can’t cave into their constituents

I can hardly believe this is happening. Like the people they are representing are the bad guys?

It seems I can’t be surprised often enough this week.